Firebug 1.7: Mozilla Backend
From FirebugWiki
Mozilla back-end represents an adapter between V8 like protocol and Mozilla JSD. This adapter lives in Firebug and implements BTI interface. This adapter should replace firebug-service in Firebug 1.7.
Contents |
[edit] Resources
[edit] Implementation
Corresponding BTI objects:
-
BTI.Browser→Firebugfirebug.js -
BTI.CompilationUnit→Firebug.SourceFilesourceFile.js -
BTI.StackFrame→FBL.StackFramelib.js -
BTI.Breakpoint→Firebug.Breakpointbreakpoint.js -
BTI.BrowserContext→Firebug.TabContexttabContext.js -
BTI.JavaScriptContext→ ?
Can you describe relations among BTI objects, which are not on the picture?
[edit] Test Cases
Exploration of some real world scenarios that happens when debugging a web application. These scenarios describe in-process usage of the firebug-service through a BTI adapter. The basic concept is as follows:
Firebug UI (Script Panel) → BTI → FBS → JSD
Where is Firebug.Debugger in this concept?
Firebug.Debugger listens for events and stores information from the events on the context object. So for example it will listen for onSourceFileCreated (or rather the BTI equivalent) and append the information about the new compilation unit on the context.
[edit] Connect
Connect to the browser.
What object in Firebug infrastructure should be responsible for this?
[edit] Get Contexts
Get list of all available contexts in the connected browser.
How TabWatcher is related to the mozilla-backend implementation?
If we think of mozilla-backend as the entire non-UI part of Firebug, then TabWatcher is part of it. TabWatcher will generate events just as it does in 1.6. Firebug.Debugger will forward some of those events through BTI.
[edit] Compilation Units
Get list of all compilation units for given context.
This scenario represents initialization of the location-list that is available on the Script panel toolbar. Displayed popup menu is initialized when the user clicks on the toolbar button.
JJB: Firebug.Debugger will get onSourceFileCreated just like 1.6. It will store info in context like 1.6. Then it will fire an event into BTI. The front end will get the event from BTI and store info in its panel. So I think we need the get-all-compilation units only for re-sync.
[edit] Get Source
Get source code (range) of given compilation unit.
This scenario happens typically when the user changes the location of the Script panel (e.g. wants to see another script file). The getSource method can be also used to get just part of the source (a range), which is used when the user scrolls the panel content. This allows to load only visible portion of the file and optimize networks traffic in case of remote debugging.
[edit] Set Breakpoint
Set a breakpoint in given compilation unit.
The Script panel is always using toggleBreakpoint call, which is consequently transformed into setBreakpoint or removeBreakpoint (depends on existence of the breakpoint).
Is the list of compilation units still stored in the BrowserContext? YES
What is the event/callback that allows to collect all compilation units? See above, it should get the compilation units as they are created.
[edit] Get Stack Trace
Get stack-trace (aka backtrace) when a breakpoint hits.
This scenario is executed when the debuggers is hanging on a breakpoint and the user shows the CallstackPanel to see the current stack-trace.
What is the JavaScriptContext here in Firebug infrastructure? I guess the JS global object
[edit] Debugger Step
Perform a debugger step (step over, step into, continue)
I don't see how to perform this action using BTI
Should this be done through an event?
[edit] Disconnect
Disconnect from the debugger
The same question as in the Connect case
[edit] Tests
In order to make sure the architecture is suitable also for remote debugging (the goal) there should be proper unit test written for it.
TODO: describe architecture of these tests
What mockup objects will be necessary here?




